Surface functionalisation is a key process in cultivated meat production, focusing on modifying scaffold surfaces to improve how cells attach, grow, and develop into tissue. By tailoring surface properties like chemistry, charge, and texture, producers can enhance cell adhesion, alignment, and differentiation - key steps in creating structured meat products. This approach supports the development of thicker, structured cuts with better texture while meeting food safety requirements.
Key points include:
- What it is: Surface functionalisation modifies scaffold surfaces without changing their core material properties.
- Why it matters: Improved cell attachment and growth lead to better yield, texture, and scalability.
- Methods: Techniques like plasma treatment, protein coatings, and peptide grafting are used.
- Analysis tools: Methods such as SEM, AFM, XPS, and biological assays validate the effectiveness of modifications.
- Challenges: Scaling these methods for commercial production while ensuring food safety and cost-efficiency.
Surface functionalisation is shaping the cultivated meat industry, helping producers refine production processes, reduce costs, and deliver high-quality products that meet consumer expectations.
Dr. David Kaplan: Using tissue engineering to grow cultivated meat
Analytical Methods for Evaluating Surface Functionalisation
After modifying a scaffold surface, researchers need to confirm that the changes are effective and produce the desired biological outcomes. This process involves a mix of physical, chemical, and biological techniques, each offering unique insights into how these modifications impact cell behaviour in cultivated meat production.
The primary objectives are to verify the presence of functional groups, coatings, or surface textures; to assess the uniformity and stability of these modifications under culture conditions; and to link surface features to measurable outcomes like cell attachment, spreading, and differentiation. Using robust analytical methods also allows researchers to compare different scaffold materials and treatments, streamlining the development of scalable, food-grade products.
For cultivated meat developers in the UK, incorporating these techniques into scaffold development can minimise trial-and-error, speeding up the transition from lab prototypes to market-ready products. Tools like Cellbase can assist by connecting researchers with suppliers offering tailored analytical services, reference materials, and equipment designed to meet the specific needs of cultivated meat production. Below are key methods used to assess these modifications.
Surface Characterisation Techniques
Physical characterisation methods help reveal the scaffold's topography, structure, and mechanical properties at micro- and nanoscales, which are critical in shaping how cells interact with the surface.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) is a widely used technique for visualising scaffold architecture. It provides high-resolution images of pore structures, fibre diameters, and surface roughness, helping determine whether the scaffold supports nutrient diffusion and muscle fibre alignment. For cultivated meat applications, SEM requires careful sample preparation, including drying and coating techniques to preserve the scaffold's structure. Researchers use magnifications that capture both the overall pore network and finer surface details, offering a comprehensive view of scaffold topography.
Atomic force microscopy (AFM) measures nanoscale surface features and stiffness by scanning a fine probe across the scaffold. Unlike SEM, AFM can operate in liquid or hydrated conditions, better mimicking the environment cells experience in bioreactors. Using methods like force-distance curves, researchers can gather data on roughness and elastic modulus - key factors for muscle and fat cell cultures. For example, muscle cells respond to stiffness cues, with elastic moduli between 10–100 kPa promoting muscle differentiation. AFM provides essential data for fine-tuning the scaffold's mechanical and chemical properties to suit cultivated meat production.
Contact angle measurements evaluate surface wettability by placing a droplet of water or cell culture medium on the scaffold and measuring the angle formed at the liquid-solid interface. A lower contact angle indicates a hydrophilic surface, while a higher angle suggests hydrophobicity. Changes in contact angle after functionalisation treatments indicate whether the surface chemistry has been successfully altered. For instance, plasma treatments or the addition of hydrophilic groups typically lower the contact angle, improving protein adsorption and cell attachment. These measurements are often conducted on flat scaffold samples like films or sheets.
These techniques collectively help researchers confirm that functionalisation has achieved the desired physical and mechanical changes without compromising the scaffold's structural integrity. This is especially important for materials like plant-based polymers, hydrogels, and edible fibres, where maintaining food-relevant processing and structural stability is critical.
Chemical Analysis Methods
While physical methods focus on structure and topography, chemical analysis confirms that the intended functional groups, coatings, or bioactive molecules are present and stable over time.
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is used to examine the elemental composition and chemical states of the scaffold’s surface. By detecting photoelectrons emitted under X-ray irradiation, XPS can verify the successful introduction of functional groups like amines, carboxyls, or grafted peptides. For cultivated meat scaffolds, this technique ensures that functionalisation strategies are food-safe, stable under bioreactor conditions, and supportive of protein adsorption that enhances cell adhesion. For example, if a scaffold is treated to introduce amine groups, XPS can confirm the presence of nitrogen at the expected concentration and chemical state.
Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) identifies bulk and near-surface functional groups by detecting specific absorption bands as infrared light interacts with the scaffold. This technique acts as a molecular fingerprint, confirming the presence of polymers, cross-linkers, and bioactive compounds, while also monitoring chemical changes after sterilisation or culture. For instance, if a scaffold is coated with a protein or peptide, FTIR can detect amide bands that indicate a successful coating. It can also reveal whether sterilisation methods like autoclaving or gamma irradiation have altered or degraded functional groups.
XPS and FTIR together provide complementary insights: XPS focuses on the outermost surface layer where cells make initial contact, while FTIR offers a broader view of the scaffold's overall chemical composition. This combination is especially useful for refining functionalisation protocols, ensuring that surface modifications are dense enough and remain stable throughout cell culture.
A typical workflow might start with FTIR and XPS for chemical confirmation, followed by SEM and AFM for structural validation. Contact angle measurements can then be used to assess changes in wettability. This integrated approach allows researchers to test multiple formulations on a small scale before advancing promising candidates to more resource-intensive biological assays. Once the scaffold's physical and chemical properties are verified, biological assays validate its functional impact on cell performance.
Biological Assays for Cell Compatibility
While physical and chemical analyses provide valuable data, biological assays ultimately determine how cells respond to functionalised scaffolds. These tests measure cell attachment, viability, proliferation, and differentiation, linking scaffold properties to tissue development.
Initial attachment assays evaluate how many cells adhere to the scaffold after a short incubation period, typically a few hours. Metrics like DNA content, metabolic activity, or direct imaging are used to quantify attached cells. For cultivated meat, high initial attachment rates are essential, as they influence how many seeded cells contribute to tissue formation. Functionalisation methods that enhance surface hydrophilicity or incorporate cell-binding peptides often improve cell adhesion.
Viability and proliferation assays monitor cell health and growth over several days. Techniques like resazurin-based tests or WST assays provide proxies for cell number, while live/dead staining and fluorescence microscopy offer insights into cell distribution and morphology in three dimensions. These assays confirm whether the scaffold supports sustained growth and whether cells spread and form interconnected networks necessary for tissue structure.
Differentiation and tissue maturation assays assess whether cells develop into functional muscle or fat tissue. For muscle cells, researchers examine metrics like myotube length, alignment, and fusion index, along with the expression of structural proteins like myosin heavy chain. For fat cells, lipid accumulation, droplet size, and adipogenic markers are evaluated to determine the scaffold's ability to support marbling-like structures. Mechanical testing of cell-scaffold constructs, such as compression or tensile testing, combined with sensory-related descriptors like firmness and juiciness, helps translate scaffold modifications into consumer-relevant properties.
When choosing analytical methods, practical considerations like sterility, food safety, and scalability are crucial. Techniques must align with food-grade materials and processes, avoiding toxic reagents or residues unsuitable for food production. Sample preparation should faithfully represent surfaces used in bioreactors, and workflows must comply with good manufacturing practices, ensuring that laboratory results translate effectively to larger-scale production formats.
Impact of Surface Functionalisation on Cultivated Meat Production
Once surface functionalisation has been validated, the next hurdle is applying these modifications to achieve tangible production benefits. The goal isn’t just to enhance cell attachment in controlled lab settings but to improve efficiency and lower costs throughout the cultivated meat production process.
Surface functionalisation plays a role at every stage, from seeding cells onto scaffolds to maturing the final tissue. By adjusting properties like surface energy, charge, hydrophilicity, and texture, scientists can guide how progenitor cells behave. This focus on improving cell adhesion is key to ensuring scalable production.
Improving Cell Attachment and Growth
Strong cell adhesion during the initial seeding phase is essential, as it prevents cell loss during media exchanges, which can negatively impact yield. Functionalisation introduces specific chemical and physical cues that promote integrin-mediated attachment, ensuring cells stick more effectively.
Beyond adhesion, functionalised surfaces actively support cell growth and tissue formation. Features like bioactive motifs and nano-structured surfaces encourage cells to multiply, differentiate, and align - critical steps for forming the organised muscle fibres needed for cultivated meat. Research shows that optimising scaffold porosity, stiffness, and surface chemistry can increase cell proliferation rates by up to 40% compared to non-functionalised scaffolds [3][4].
Different types of functionalisation can be tailored to suit specific cell types. For example, chemical modifications (like adding carboxyl, amine, or hydroxyl groups) improve wettability and protein adsorption, while coatings inspired by the extracellular matrix (ECM) provide targeted cues for developing muscle or fat cells. One study combined 1% pea protein isolates with 1% alginate in a 1:1 ratio to create mould-based scaffolds. These scaffolds enhanced the mechanical, physical, and biological properties needed for bovine satellite cell proliferation and differentiation [1].
Another promising approach involves self-healing hydrogels, which allow the assembly of muscle and fat monocultures into thick, multi-layered constructs. These hydrogels can even replicate the marbling patterns of conventional meat. Impressively, they retained over 71% compressive strength and 63.4–78.0% hysteresis energy density after repeated stress tests [2].
Scalability Considerations for Functionalised Scaffolds
While lab results show promise, scaling up surface functionalisation for commercial production introduces new challenges. Achieving uniform, cost-efficient modifications across complex 3D structures is no small feat.
Food safety and regulatory standards add another layer of complexity. Functionalisation methods must use food-safe chemistries and be compatible with standard cleaning and sterilisation processes. Techniques like atmospheric plasma treatment or dip- and spray-coating stand out because they can treat large volumes of material consistently. Printing technologies, such as inkjet or extrusion of functional inks, offer precise control over surface properties and can be integrated into automated production systems.
The functionalisation strategy should also match the intended product. For minced cultivated meat, the priority might be maximising cell expansion and biomass density. On the other hand, structured cuts like steak require surfaces that encourage anisotropic alignment and create controlled differentiation gradients. To assess scalability, researchers need to link lab-scale results - such as cell attachment and growth rates - to production metrics. Comparing functionalised and non-functionalised scaffolds under identical production conditions can provide clear evidence of improved efficiency and cost savings.
Case Studies: Applications in Cultivated Meat Research
Real-world studies highlight both the challenges and successes of scaling functionalised scaffolds. For example, polymer and polysaccharide scaffolds modified to improve hydrophilicity or include bioactive motifs have shown higher myoblast adhesion, better myotube alignment, and more stable co-culture with adipocytes when compared to unmodified scaffolds.
These studies emphasise the need to balance mechanical strength with biological functionality. Functionalisation must enhance bioactivity without compromising the scaffold’s structural integrity. This is especially critical for edible scaffolds, which must be food-safe and maintain the desired texture throughout processing. Compatibility with sterilisation methods is also crucial, as techniques that work well in small-scale samples may fail under industrial conditions like autoclaving or gamma irradiation.
Scaling from small-scale substrates to industrial 3D formats requires additional development. Addressing these challenges early can ease the transition to commercial production. Platforms like Cellbase play a key role in this process by connecting researchers with specialised suppliers and offering a centralised hub for cultivated meat technologies. By providing access to a variety of scaffold materials and functionalisation-ready substrates, Cellbase supports the selection, testing, and scaling of optimised scaffolds.
Research so far demonstrates that well-designed surface functionalisation can significantly boost cell attachment, proliferation, and tissue development in cultivated meat production. However, achieving these benefits on a commercial scale requires careful planning to ensure compatibility with production processes, food safety standards, and economic feasibility.
sbb-itb-ffee270
How Cellbase Supports Scaffold Development
Creating and scaling functionalised scaffolds for cultivated meat is no small feat. It requires access to specialised materials, dependable suppliers, and up-to-date technical know-how. For research teams and start-ups in the UK, finding the right scaffolds and surface modifiers has often meant navigating a maze of fragmented supplier networks or relying on general lab supply platforms that lack expertise in this niche. Cellbase steps in to simplify this process, offering a procurement platform built specifically for the cultivated meat sector. This tailored approach ensures scaffold development stays closely aligned with production demands.
Access to Specialised Scaffolds and Materials
Cellbase serves as a central hub for sourcing essential materials like edible hydrogels, plant-based fibres, bioinks, and surface modifiers (e.g., peptides, ECM proteins, plasma-treated polymers). The platform allows R&D teams to filter options by species, tissue type, and food-grade compliance, making it easier to meet safety standards and process requirements.
Each listing on Cellbase provides detailed technical information, such as material composition, elastic modulus, pore size, degradation rates, and food-grade certification. For surface-functionalised scaffolds, the platform includes specifics like functional groups or ligands (e.g., RGD motifs, ECM coatings, or plasma-induced chemistries), recommended seeding densities, and validated cell types. This level of detail helps process engineers evaluate factors like cell attachment efficiency, media consumption, and bioreactor compatibility for larger-scale operations.
When comparing functionalised scaffold options, Cellbase offers side-by-side comparisons of key attributes such as attachment efficiency, proliferation rates, compatible culture formats (e.g., microcarriers, sheets, fibres), and maximum culture durations. User reviews, application notes, and case studies provide additional insights into lot-to-lot consistency, ease of handling, and performance in cultivated meat workflows. By integrating scaffolds, media, bioreactors, and sensors into a single platform, Cellbase helps teams select surface chemistries that work seamlessly with their chosen media formulations, shear conditions, and cleaning protocols - minimising the risk of small-scale successes failing at pilot production.
The platform also highlights advanced scaffold formats like aligned fibre mats, hybrid gel–fibre systems, and self-healing or 3D-printed hydrogels. These innovative formats allow spatial patterning of muscle and fat cells to create marbling, improving both texture and visual appeal. Listings detail compatibility with specific functionalisation techniques, such as plasma-treated surfaces, chemically activated gels for peptide coupling, or nanostructured fibres that guide myotube alignment.
Procurement needs vary by development stage. Early R&D often requires small quantities of flexible, well-documented scaffolds, while pilot-scale efforts demand suppliers that can offer bulk volumes, stable pricing, and proven scalability for food-grade applications.
Industry Connections and Knowledge Sharing
Cellbase goes beyond procurement by fostering collaboration and knowledge sharing - critical elements for advancing scaffold functionalisation. The platform enables direct connections between scaffold suppliers and cultivated meat companies, encouraging joint development projects. For instance, a scaffold manufacturer might work with a cultivated meat producer to adapt a plant-based scaffold for a bovine or avian cell line using tailored surface treatments. These partnerships, facilitated through direct messaging or partnership programmes on Cellbase, ensure that commercial terms and intellectual property agreements remain securely between the two parties.
The platform also serves as a knowledge hub, sharing best practices and addressing common challenges in scaffold functionalisation. Technical notes, reviews, and open-access research explore how factors like surface charge, wettability, and ligand density influence cell attachment. In November 2025, Cellbase published an article titled "Top 7 Biomaterials for Cultivated Meat Scaffolds" in its Insights & News section, offering detailed guidance on critical materials for scaffold development. Webinars, expert Q&A sessions, and curated resources address recurring issues - such as sterilisation-related functionality loss or poor performance in food-grade media - and propose practical solutions from the community.
For teams in the UK and Europe, Cellbase provides curated updates on trends like the shift to non-animal, food-grade scaffolds, new functionalisation chemistries, and advances in scalable edible materials. The platform also links to position papers and reviews on safety, allergenicity, and labelling requirements for edible scaffolds, helping teams anticipate regulatory hurdles during pre-commercial trials.
What sets Cellbase apart is its exclusive focus on cultivated meat. Filters, categories, and product descriptions are tailored to sector-specific needs, such as edibility, sensory impact, and compatibility with high-density muscle or fat cultures. This focus encourages suppliers to provide data relevant to final product quality - like cooking stability and texture outcomes - ensuring that scaffolds not only support cell growth but also meet the demands of manufacturing and consumer expectations.
Conclusion and Future Directions
Surface functionalisation has become a key factor in cultivated meat production, directly impacting cell attachment, growth, and tissue organisation. The methods explored in this article - ranging from spectroscopy and microscopy to biological assays - equip researchers with tools to move beyond trial-and-error, enabling the design of scaffolds with predictable outcomes. As the cultivated meat sector in the UK matures, linking surface properties like chemistry, texture, and mechanics to measurable results such as cell viability, muscle alignment, and fat distribution will be vital for achieving consistent and scalable production. These advancements highlight the importance of precise surface engineering in overcoming production hurdles.
Key Takeaways
The evidence is clear: surface properties are just as important as the scaffold's overall composition. For instance, altering the surface charge of a scaffold can significantly boost cell adhesion and viability. Similarly, nanoscale topography has shown to improve muscle fibre formation.
Analytical tools like spectroscopy, contact angle analysis, and microscopy make it possible to measure surface chemistry, wettability, and roughness - turning functionalisation strategies into actionable data. Biological assays that assess cell adhesion, growth, and differentiation help connect surface properties to practical outcomes, such as better yield, texture, and reproducibility.
For producers, effective surface functionalisation offers clear benefits. It can accelerate the achievement of target cell densities, reduce the need for expensive growth factors, and improve production consistency, ultimately lowering costs. On the product side, tailored surfaces help achieve the desired textures, fat-muscle organisation, and water retention that allow cultivated meat to compete with - or even surpass - the sensory qualities of traditional meat.
However, challenges remain. Many promising functionalisation techniques have yet to transition from lab-scale prototypes to food-grade, high-throughput manufacturing. Ensuring that functional groups, crosslinkers, and residual chemicals meet food safety standards while maintaining stability during production - and avoiding negative impacts on taste or digestibility - requires thorough validation.
Future Trends and Opportunities
Building on these insights, exciting trends are emerging that could reshape scaffold design. The advanced analytical tools and scaffold technologies discussed earlier are laying the groundwork for these next steps.
Future scaffolds are expected to be dynamic and responsive, with the ability to adjust stiffness or ligand presentation during cultivation to guide the development of muscle and fat tissues. Self-healing hydrogel scaffolds, for example, are already enabling the creation of thick, marbled prototypes with customisable fat-muscle patterns - without the need for meat glues or complex processing. These systems have demonstrated impressive cell viability rates, comparable to Matrigel controls (over 95% for myofibres), showing that food-grade scaffolds can match the performance of animal-derived materials [5].
Advances in non-animal, edible biomaterials are also converging with surface functionalisation strategies. Scaffolds made from plant, fungal, or polysaccharide-based systems - such as alginate–pea protein, starch-based, or nanocellulose-reinforced hydrogels - are being developed with adjustable porosity, mechanical strength, and biochemical anchoring sites. These materials not only comply with food safety regulations but also support cell growth on an industrial scale. By combining these materials with precise surface modifications, like grafted peptides or controlled charge patterns, researchers could create scaffolds that meet regulatory standards while delivering high-performance results.
Future research should focus on high-throughput systems that automate surface modifications and provide rapid feedback on cell behaviour. Mapping how specific surface features influence cell proliferation, differentiation, and tissue structure could lead to more efficient designs. Integrating mechanical, chemical, and biological data into predictive models could further streamline the development process, reducing experimental cycles and speeding up product innovation.
For UK-based researchers and start-ups, collaboration will be a driving force. Partnerships between universities, cultivated meat companies, and ingredient suppliers can test functionalised scaffolds under real-world bioreactor conditions, ensuring scalability and compatibility with existing media. Shared resources, open data on performance metrics, and collaborative consortia can help distribute costs and reduce redundancy, accelerating the development of industry standards.
Platforms like Cellbase can play a pivotal role in this ecosystem by connecting scaffold developers with end users. By offering product data, performance benchmarks, and user feedback, Cellbase can help producers make informed procurement decisions and bridge the gap between laboratory innovations and commercial-scale production.
Ultimately, the future of cultivated meat will depend on balancing food safety and edibility with biofunctionality. Combining tailored surface chemistry, micro- and nano-scale textures, and mechanical properties that mimic natural muscle tissue - while adhering to food regulations - will be essential. As analytical tools advance and scaffold materials diversify, the cultivated meat industry will be better equipped to meet consumer demands for taste, texture, and sustainability. Once a niche research area, surface functionalisation has become a cornerstone of production strategy, poised to shape the future of cultivated meat in the UK and beyond.
FAQs
How does surface functionalisation improve the texture and structure of cultivated meat?
Surface functionalisation is key to improving the texture and structure of cultivated meat. By tweaking the properties of scaffolds, scientists can create surfaces that encourage cells to attach, grow, and develop in a way that mirrors natural tissue.
This approach helps ensure the final product has the texture and structural qualities similar to traditional meat. To guarantee consistency and quality, advanced analytical techniques are employed to assess and refine these modifications throughout the production process.
What challenges arise when scaling up surface functionalisation techniques for cultivated meat production, and how are they being tackled?
Scaling up surface functionalisation techniques for cultivated meat production comes with its own set of hurdles. One major challenge is ensuring that functionalised scaffolds consistently meet quality standards on a commercial scale. Even minor inconsistencies can affect how well cells attach and grow, potentially compromising the final product. On top of that, the materials and processes involved in functionalisation need to be cost-efficient to make large-scale production financially practical.
To tackle these issues, researchers are turning to advanced analytical tools to closely examine scaffold properties and understand how they influence cell behaviour. At the same time, breakthroughs in material science are paving the way for more scalable and budget-friendly functionalisation methods, helping cultivated meat production strike the right balance between quality and affordability.
How do analytical methods like SEM and AFM help evaluate scaffold surface functionalisation in cultivated meat production?
Analytical tools like Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) are indispensable for evaluating the surface characteristics of scaffolds. These advanced techniques offer a closer look at critical surface features, including texture, topography, and chemical composition, all of which directly influence how well cells can attach and grow.
Properly functionalised scaffolds, assessed through these methods, play a key role in boosting the reliability and efficiency of cultivated meat production. This ensures the development of high-quality products that can be scaled up to meet industry demands.
